An open index of research

A status.lu publication

Economics

Global Evidence on Economic Preferences

Armin Falk, Anke Becker, Thomas Dohmen, Benjamin Enke, David Huffman, Uwe Sunde

Published November 2018 · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · Journal article

Summary

Using the Global Preference Survey, a dataset of risk, time, social, and trust preferences measured for about 80,000 individuals across 76 countries, the authors document how fundamental economic preferences vary across populations. They show systematic relationships between these preferences and individual behaviors as well as aggregate national outcomes. The paper also explores how geographic, cultural, and historical factors correlate with the global distribution of preferences.

Key findings

  • Introduces and validates the Global Preference Survey covering ~80,000 people in 76 countries representing roughly 90% of world population.
  • Preferences vary substantially both across and within countries and correlate with individual outcomes and aggregate economic measures.
  • Variation in preferences relates systematically to geographic, cultural, and historical characteristics of populations.

Subjects & keywords

Cite this paper

APA

Armin Falk, Anke Becker, Thomas Dohmen, Benjamin Enke, David Huffman, & Uwe Sunde (2018). Global Evidence on Economic Preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjy013

BibTeX
@article{falk2018global,
  author    = {Armin Falk and Anke Becker and Thomas Dohmen and Benjamin Enke and David Huffman and Uwe Sunde},
  title     = {Global Evidence on Economic Preferences},
  journal   = {The Quarterly Journal of Economics},
  year      = {2018},
  doi       = {10.1093/qje/qjy013},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjy013}
}

Related in Economics

Social Capital I: Measurement and Associations with Economic Mobility

Raj Chetty, Matthew O. Jackson, Theresa Kuchler and Johannes Stroebel

Using data on 21 billion Facebook friendships, the authors construct ZIP-code-level measures of three distinct forms of social capital: cross-class connectedness, social cohesion, and civic engagement. They show these measures vary widely across areas and are only weakly correlated with one another. They find that economic connectedness between low- and high-income people is strongly associated with upward income mobility, more so than other forms of social capital.

Nature Open access

Imperfect Competition, Compensating Differentials, and Rent Sharing in the US Labor Market

Thibaut Lamadon, Magne Mogstad and Bradley Setzler

The authors build and estimate an equilibrium model of imperfect competition in the US labor market using linked employer-employee administrative data, combining firm-level productivity shocks with worker mobility. They quantify the degree of employer wage-setting power (monopsony), how firms share rents with workers, and the role of compensating differentials for non-wage amenities. They find that firms have substantial market power and pass through only part of productivity gains to wages, while amenities matter for worker sorting.

American Economic ReviewJournal article

Difference-in-Differences with Multiple Time Periods

Brantly Callaway and Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna

The paper develops a framework for difference-in-differences designs in which units adopt treatment at different times across multiple periods. It defines group-time average treatment effects and shows how to identify and estimate them under conditional parallel trends, then aggregate them into interpretable summary parameters. The authors provide valid simultaneous inference and apply the methods to estimating the effect of minimum wage increases on teen employment.

Journal of Econometrics Open access